bet9ja.com
Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting ban?
By Natalie Sherman
bet9ja.com
Business press reporter, New York
A restriction on sports betting in a lot of US states might be reversed by a case being thought about by the Supreme Court.
The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that largely disallowed sports betting, describing the matter as a "states' rights" problem.
The case, which began on Monday, comes after New Jersey locals voted in 2011 to legalise sports betting wagering.
A group of sports betting leagues opposes banking on games, which they fear will encourage match-fixing.
Lower courts have regularly ruled against New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to limit a state's policy choices.
The Supreme Court decided to hear the case however amid a broader shift in American mindsets toward gambling.
Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal casinos outside Native American lands.
But over the last few years, states starving for tax income in the wake of the financial crash have actually enacted a rash of looser gaming laws, collecting significant levies on gambling profits.
There are now 24 states with industrial gambling establishments - approximately double the number a decade earlier.
Despite the official ban, which already excuses Nevada and three other states, illegal sports betting wagering is rife in the US.
Americans put about $154bn in unlawful sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.
The association's president, Geoff Freeman, described the ban, external as an "utter failure" previously this year.
It says the UK is an example of a nation where sports betting is commonplace.
"It's time for Washington to stop depriving states of vital tax profits and permit them to gain the benefits of a regulated market," Mr Freeman said.
More than 15 states submitted documents in support of New Jersey in the event. A handful have currently passed laws to authorise sports betting in the event of a change.
'Times have altered'
On Monday, as attorneys began arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.
The court is expected to decide in June 2018.
"If we are effective here we might have bets being taken in New Jersey within two weeks of a choice by the court," stated outbound New Jersey governor Chris Christie after attending the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're ready to go."
Despite the court's last judgment, Congress might also use up the argument in the middle of broader discussion about online gaming and e-sports betting.
Even a few of the professional sports betting leagues have begun to alter their positions on the question of gambling.
Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would create an uniform set of guidelines across the US. "Times have actually changed," he wrote in a 2014 opinion piece, external.
Addicts having problem with mobile sports betting
3 October 2017
bet9ja.com
The challenging concern of issue gambling
31 August 2017
bet9ja.com
1
Will it be a Slam Dunk for the US Sports Betting Ban?
ezrashafer7291 edited this page 8 months ago